Investors in shares must expect market shocks as part of the long-term benefits of owning part of a company. Over time, stock markets fall one year in every five. History provides a valuable guide to how markets normally recover from shocks, and this article illustrates some of the dangers of exiting equities and not re-entering.
However, it must be acknowledged that coronavirus did not start as a financial shock, such as a rapid fall in share prices or a market collapse such as the GFC or tech wreck. This started as a social and health scare and has spread into financial markets, which might limit what history can teach us. As supply chains close and countries shut their borders, the wealth created by globalisation will be compromised, and with it, economic growth and business activity.
Morningstar has prepared a series of slides based on US data which show market recoveries and some basic investing principles, and we have selected the following four highlights.
The stock market moves in cycles with periods of contraction followed by periods of expansion. There have been eight market downturns in the past 47 years. The regions shaded in orange below highlight a contraction phase of a stock market cycle, and the green regions show an expansion phase. A contraction is defined as a period when the stock market value declines from its peak by 10% or more.
These declines seem to happen at random and last for varying time periods. Expansion measures the recovery of the index from the bottom of a contraction and the subsequent performance of the index until it reaches the next peak level before another 10% decline.
While some periods of decline have been severe, the market has increased over time. For instance, the stock market fell by 14.7% from its peak at month-end May 1990 to its trough in October 1990 but grew by 355.1% from November 1990 to its next peak in June 1998.
No one can predict market declines with certainty. Investors should have a long-term investment horizon to allow their investment to grow over time but returns from stocks are not guaranteed.
Note: Large stocks are represented by the Ibbotson® Large Company Stock Index. The data assumes reinvestment of all income and does not account for taxes or transaction costs.
History reveals that small stocks have been among the strongest performers after recessions. Many investors fear the volatility of small stocks, but the potential of this asset class should not be ignored. The chart below shows that, on average, the cumulative returns of small stocks outperformed those of large stocks one month, six months, one year, and three years after the end of a recession.
Diversification does not eliminate the risk of investment losses. Stocks are more volatile than other asset classes. Furthermore, small stocks are more volatile than large stocks and are subject to significant price fluctuations and business risks and are thinly traded.
(On the data, the average cumulative returns are calculated from the end of each of the 10 recessions in U.S. history since 1953. The National Bureau of Economic Research defines a recession as a recurring period of decline in total output, income, employment, and trade, usually lasting from six months to a year and marked by widespread contractions in many sectors of the economy).
Note: Large stocks are represented by the Ibbotson® Large Company Stock Index. Small stocks are represented by the Ibbotson® Small Company Stock Index.
Investors who attempt to time the market run the risk of missing periods of exceptional returns, compromising an otherwise sound investment strategy.
Missing the one best month during a year drastically reduces returns in this chart. During years when returns were already negative, the effect of missing the best month exaggerates the loss for the year. In seven of the 49 years shown -1970, 1978, 1984, 1987, 1994, 2011, and 2015 – otherwise positive returns would have been dragged into negative territory by missing the best month.
Investors who attempt to time the market run the risk of missing periods of exceptional returns. The following chart illustrates the risk of attempting to time the stock market over the past 20 years by showing returns if investors had missed some of the best days in the market.
The bottom graph illustrates the daily returns for all 5,035 trading days in the sample.
Investors who stayed in the market for all 5,035 trading days achieved a compound annual return of 6.1% from 2000 to 2019. However, that same investment would have returned 2.4% had the investor missed only the 10 best days of stock returns.
Further, missing the 50 best days would have produced a loss of 5.5%. Although the market has exhibited volatility on a daily basis, over the long term, stock investors who stayed the course were rewarded.
The appeal of market-timing is obvious. Investors want to improve portfolio returns by avoiding periods of poor performance. However, timing the market consistently is extremely difficult, and unsuccessful market-timing (the more likely result) can lead to a significant opportunity loss.
Note: Stocks in this example are represented by the Ibbotson® Large Company Stock Index.
The overall lessons are:
Our clients’ financial well-being is our number one objective. We continue to work hard behind the scenes to monitor this unfolding situation. If you have any questions about your specific situation, please contact us. We are here help.
This advice may not be suitable to you because it contains general advice that has not been tailored to your personal circumstances. Please seek personal financial and tax/or legal advice prior to acting on this information. Before acquiring a financial product a person should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the contents of the PDS before making a decision about whether to acquire the product. The material contained in this document is based on information received in good faith from sources within the market, and on our understanding of legislation and Government press releases at the date of publication, which are believed to be reliable and accurate. Opinions constitute our judgment at the time of issue and are subject to change. Neither, the Licensee or any of the Oreana Group of companies, nor their employees or directors give any warranty of accuracy, nor accept any responsibility for errors or omissions in this document. Gordon Thoms and David Conte of Calibre Private Wealth Advisers are Authorised Representatives of Oreana Financial Services Limited ABN 91 607 515 122, an Australian Financial Services Licensee, Registered office at Level 7, 484 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004. This site is designed for Australian residents only. Nothing on this website is an offer or a solicitation of an offer to acquire any products or services, by any person or entity outside of Australia.